What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us? 32 He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things? 33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth. 34 Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us. 35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? 36 As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. (Romans 8:31-36)
Another Handel's Messiah moment; If God be for us who can be against us? Fond memories of that song.
So here's the point, God the Father is unimaginably powerful, and he let his Son Jesus die for you because he loved you so much. How can anything bad ever happen to you?
Well, it can actually; though as we saw in verse 28, this will be for your ultimate good. God has a way of making things turn out well, no matter how bad they may seem right now. When things are good we do not need to be afraid for the future because God will take care of us, we have peace. When things are bad we do not need to despair for the future because God will take care of us, we have hope.
I have experienced these, you can too, if you submit to Jesus.
Wednesday, 29 October 2014
Saturday, 25 October 2014
Romans 8:28-30 // If you love God
And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. 29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified. (Romans 8:28-30)
What is Paul talking about? He is saying that God has your life under control if you love him.
If you love God, he is making everything in your life contribute to your ultimate happiness.
If you love God, he knew it long ago, and determined long ago to restore you to the image of his Son, to be alike in character.
If you love God, he wants you to be one of Jesus' brothers or sisters.
If you love God, he has pleaded with you to come back to him.
If you love God, he has pardoned your sins (got you off the hook) publicly.
If you love God, he has starting making you an awesome (glorious) person.
Not everybody loves God, it is worthwhile for you and me to love him, and to encourage everyone else to do the same. The place to start is by showing love to those around us.
What is Paul talking about? He is saying that God has your life under control if you love him.
If you love God, he is making everything in your life contribute to your ultimate happiness.
If you love God, he knew it long ago, and determined long ago to restore you to the image of his Son, to be alike in character.
If you love God, he wants you to be one of Jesus' brothers or sisters.
If you love God, he has pleaded with you to come back to him.
If you love God, he has pardoned your sins (got you off the hook) publicly.
If you love God, he has starting making you an awesome (glorious) person.
Not everybody loves God, it is worthwhile for you and me to love him, and to encourage everyone else to do the same. The place to start is by showing love to those around us.
Friday, 24 October 2014
Romans 8:26-27 // When In Doubt, Just Pray
Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. 27 And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God. (Romans 8:26-27)
Not only will the Spirit of God restore us physically to a perfect state when Jesus returns, but the Holy Spirit helps overcome our weaknesses now. An example is prayer. We often don't know what we should pray about, but if we are simply putting the time in to pray, the Holy Spirit will echo our feelings that we cannot express in words. God, who knows the hearts of all, also knows the thoughts of the Holy Spirit who thus asks God for things on our behalf when we are not able to do it consciously.
I am glad that the Holy Spirit can intercede for me, because I frequently am overwhelmed by the sheer number of things I could pray for. Just to kneel in humility and come before God is enough, even if you can't get words out, prayer is doing you good. It is better to get the words out if you can though, since this helps you to appreciate it a little when God answers your prayer. Sometimes I have had what I felt was an answer to a prayer that I had not even prayed, I think that is an example of this.
If you are not sure how to pray, just pray.
Not only will the Spirit of God restore us physically to a perfect state when Jesus returns, but the Holy Spirit helps overcome our weaknesses now. An example is prayer. We often don't know what we should pray about, but if we are simply putting the time in to pray, the Holy Spirit will echo our feelings that we cannot express in words. God, who knows the hearts of all, also knows the thoughts of the Holy Spirit who thus asks God for things on our behalf when we are not able to do it consciously.
I am glad that the Holy Spirit can intercede for me, because I frequently am overwhelmed by the sheer number of things I could pray for. Just to kneel in humility and come before God is enough, even if you can't get words out, prayer is doing you good. It is better to get the words out if you can though, since this helps you to appreciate it a little when God answers your prayer. Sometimes I have had what I felt was an answer to a prayer that I had not even prayed, I think that is an example of this.
If you are not sure how to pray, just pray.
Thursday, 23 October 2014
Romans 8:24-25 // Sick of Waiting for a Tree of Life
For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for? 25 But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it. (Romans 8:24-25)
Hope deferred maketh the heart sick: but when the desire cometh, it is a tree of life. (Proverbs 13:12)
Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ (Titus 2:13)
Hope deferred makes the heart sick. This is a true saying. I have had hopes that dragged on without resolution, neither having nor losing. It is a sorry state to be in. When I have something I have the joy of possession. As Christians there are many things that we possess even now: forgiveness of past sins, power over sin and Satan, laws, wisdom and power to live harmoniously with those around us. But there are also things we do not yet have: Immortality, freedom from sorrow, freedom to learn and explore all things. But when Jesus returns in glory we will obtain these things. For this reason we have a hope in Jesus return, because until he returns these things will not be ours. Some wait more patiently than others, for whatever reason. Some expect this return to be very soon, many with this expectation have been bitterly disappointed in the past, their hope was deferred and their hearts made sick. But whether you are sick of waiting or patiently waiting, if you have legitimate hope in Jesus' second coming, when it comes it will be for you a tree of life. Literally and metaphorically.
Hope deferred maketh the heart sick: but when the desire cometh, it is a tree of life. (Proverbs 13:12)
Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ (Titus 2:13)
Hope deferred makes the heart sick. This is a true saying. I have had hopes that dragged on without resolution, neither having nor losing. It is a sorry state to be in. When I have something I have the joy of possession. As Christians there are many things that we possess even now: forgiveness of past sins, power over sin and Satan, laws, wisdom and power to live harmoniously with those around us. But there are also things we do not yet have: Immortality, freedom from sorrow, freedom to learn and explore all things. But when Jesus returns in glory we will obtain these things. For this reason we have a hope in Jesus return, because until he returns these things will not be ours. Some wait more patiently than others, for whatever reason. Some expect this return to be very soon, many with this expectation have been bitterly disappointed in the past, their hope was deferred and their hearts made sick. But whether you are sick of waiting or patiently waiting, if you have legitimate hope in Jesus' second coming, when it comes it will be for you a tree of life. Literally and metaphorically.
Wednesday, 22 October 2014
Romans 8:18-23 // Immortal Animals
For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. 19 For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. 20 For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, 21 Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now. 23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body. (Romans 8:18-23)
Paul knew a thing or two about suffering. When we witness to people we get upset that they ignore us, when Paul witnessed to people, they tried to kill him (e.g. Acts 14). You could say Paul lost everything for Jesus, but he did not think his losses were worth even comparing to the rewards. Paul imagines all the creatures of our world waiting for the time when we will be restored and this world will be restored with us. Because all creation is suffering under the curse because of us from the fall to this day, but creation will be restored when we are restored. When we were cursed with mortality, animals were also cursed with us, and when we are given immortality, so will the animals. I do not know whether the animals we know today will personally be in the new Earth, but I see no reason that they should not be.
It is not just animals that suffer under creation, but our own physical bodies. Especially as we grow old we begin to feel the effects of the curse, and we look forward to the time when our bodies will be perfect forever.
Paul knew a thing or two about suffering. When we witness to people we get upset that they ignore us, when Paul witnessed to people, they tried to kill him (e.g. Acts 14). You could say Paul lost everything for Jesus, but he did not think his losses were worth even comparing to the rewards. Paul imagines all the creatures of our world waiting for the time when we will be restored and this world will be restored with us. Because all creation is suffering under the curse because of us from the fall to this day, but creation will be restored when we are restored. When we were cursed with mortality, animals were also cursed with us, and when we are given immortality, so will the animals. I do not know whether the animals we know today will personally be in the new Earth, but I see no reason that they should not be.
It is not just animals that suffer under creation, but our own physical bodies. Especially as we grow old we begin to feel the effects of the curse, and we look forward to the time when our bodies will be perfect forever.
Tuesday, 21 October 2014
Confess your Faults
Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much. (James 5:16)
Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves. (Philippians 2:3)
Resolve disagreements. Resolve them from a standpoint that I am more at fault, do not be defensive.
What does it mean to confess faults? Is that telling everyone about my sins?
There is a reason why the word faults is used instead of "sins"; in both the Greek and the English sin is deliberate misbehaviour whereas fault is an accidental failure. Confess, in both English and Greek actually means to acknowledge or agree, not to tell someone a secret. So confess your faults does not mean tell people about your specific sins, but rather it means be willing to admit when you are wrong.
That's it, be willing to admit when you are wrong.
Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves. (Philippians 2:3)
Resolve disagreements. Resolve them from a standpoint that I am more at fault, do not be defensive.
What does it mean to confess faults? Is that telling everyone about my sins?
There is a reason why the word faults is used instead of "sins"; in both the Greek and the English sin is deliberate misbehaviour whereas fault is an accidental failure. Confess, in both English and Greek actually means to acknowledge or agree, not to tell someone a secret. So confess your faults does not mean tell people about your specific sins, but rather it means be willing to admit when you are wrong.
That's it, be willing to admit when you are wrong.
Monday, 20 October 2014
Pornography is Legalised Brutality
Note: I have not put any explicit content here, I don't think that is appropriate, but what I discuss in this post is very troubling. I also try to be very honest about my own deep, subconscious attitudes. This is not the kind of thing I think about, talk about or write about usually. I just think it needs to be done.
Yet ye say, Wherefore? Because the Lord hath been witness between thee and the wife of thy youth, against whom thou hast dealt treacherously: yet is she thy companion, and the wife of thy covenant. 15 And did not he make one? Yet had he the residue of the spirit. And wherefore one? That he might seek a godly seed. Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously against the wife of his youth. 16 For the Lord, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away: for one covereth violence with his garment, saith the Lord of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously. (Malachi 2:14-16)
God cares about women. While browsing an online forum about psychology I noticed a thread about ways of overcoming addiction to pornography. I have heard about pornography from the pulpit from time to time but I don't remember ever hearing anyone giving ideas about how to get out of it. So I looked at the thread and saw some men had made a few suggestions. But a woman posted a long article (or more like fact-sheet) that was intended to show that pornography is bad.
For the purposes of the thread, I'm not sure how relevant the article was. But it may be useful for people to know how brutal pornography actually is. Let me explain the reasoning, I don't remember where I read/heard it, but the reasoning is very good I think. Lust, sinful desire (not necessarily sexual), is a particularly selfish sin. (Proverbs 6:30-32) In fact we could probably suppose that lust is selfishness in its raw form. In this sense "lust" is entirely different from "sexual arousal/passion/desire" although these words are often used interchangeably. Sexual arousal, passion and desire can be appropriate in the right context (Hebrews 13:4) and a book of the Bible is even dedicated to this, though we often like to spiritualise it away (Song of Solomon).
Sexual arousal is closely linked with love, trust and empathy, lust is not. Lust is closely linked with violence, hatred and… pornography. Lust is a desire to have; to have pleasure, power and fulfilment with no regard to others. This is why the Bible says: I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. (Romans 7:7b) Covet, meaning breaking the 10th Commandment, wanting something that you cannot have without hurting someone, a desire that cannot be righteously satisfied as I once heard it defined.
To experience lust and love at the same time is not possible, because lust wants to take from others and love wants to give to others. It is possible to experience pleasure in the context of love (in any sense), in fact, it is impossible to give love and not experience pleasure. The "selfless" act always brings an emotional reward. It is good to receive love from others, and even seek love from others, especially from God (Acts 17:27; Matthew 6:33) but not to take from them what they do not want to give.
There seem to be three types of exchange. Lustful exchange, taking anything by force or manipulation (including short term giving/loving behaviour), we call this violence. Equal exchange, giving something on the condition of receiving something in return, we call this business, commerce. Loving exchange, giving to another person unconditionally often resulting in a loving exchange in return. We all desire so much to participate in a loving exchange, and a relationship with God is the ultimate fulfilment of that desire.
Since lust and love are so contradictory; hatred and violence cannot exist in the mind while empathy is present. While empathising with a person, one cannot hate or violate. That is the theory. Practically speaking, when people are aware of the horrors that people, especially women, who are involved in producing pornography must endure they must be prompted to feel empathy. This feeling of empathy overwhelms lust, leading the viewer of pornography to be horrified by what he sees not exited.
I have known this idea for some time and had the opportunity to practice it. Growing up in a Christian family sheltered me from many things, but going to school or just passing along a street provide ample sources of corruption. I say corruption because what I was exposed to affected me, though not only in the way people usually talk about.
I experienced an element of lust from what I saw, from what my friends told me and from the way that young women related to me. I frequently saw people who should have been wearing more clothes, both in images and reality. Fortunately I rarely saw complete nakedness, unfortunately, not never. My friends and others who were not my friends told me about things I was not yet curious about at the time, awakening these things before I was naturally ready for them. Their way of talking about sexuality also led to making it a little more separated from marriage and relationship in my mind than it had been. This is typically called the "objectification of women", which starts in the images and gets fostered by young males spending too much unsupervised time among themselves. The behaviour of the young women was usually quite okay. The problem is that it only takes one or two young women to do a lot of damage.
There are a minority of young women in high school who develop early; often mentally but especially physically, and because of the way our system operates, these young women actually have a lot of influence on high school culture and therefore the mental development of many people. In the public (government) school I went to, these young women seemed to get their identity from their sexuality and I think my lack of interest in them was taken as an insult. They attempted to reform me at times, or punish me, I'm not sure which. But I thought it was normal that women would do this, just a fact of life, until I went to a Christian school and I saw a much better world.
Anyway, this is all to say that lust has two sides. The side the Christianity talks about is the sexual desire side, but there is another side, hatred of women. My public school education created a resentment in me towards women. It was women, both teachers and students, that seemed to be attacking me and manipulating me, I feared them and maybe I even hated them.
This is a very new realisation for me, but I share it because I think it is extremely widespread. I believe that although I know I have room for improvement, Jesus has healed my attitude towards women. For the last few years I have had to work with women in ways that has required me to grow a lot spiritually. My work has been in a powerless, assisting role in my local church congregation, the de facto (real) leaders in this congregation are all women, various kinds of women. They have been my supervisors, my co-workers, my teachers, my directors, my rebukers, my counsellors, often simultaneously. They all have been my friends. I believe God put them in my life to bring a restoration to my mind.
I still believe it is wrong for women to exercise authority over men (1 Timothy 2:12), at least in the church. I am not meant to be writing about feminism but about pornography. I got onto this topic because I was trying to understand and recall my ineffective way of overcoming lust.
I knew it was wrong to desire women as an object, and I resisted this temptation better than most I think, but instead Satan took me with the other trap. I thought that to avoid lusting I needed to hate instead and I began to hate the average promiscuous (sexually active) woman. I am sure I did not think this consciously, but it just seemed a natural assumption. For example, I would be forced to hear or sing songs that I associated with either female promiscuity or feminism and my friends and I would deal with them by changing the words to make them about hate or death. I am not the first to have done this kind of thing, and I may have picked it up somewhere. Roman Catholicism and Freemasonry are notable for connecting womanhood with evil and there are no doubt a lot of more present-day examples.
Pornography is probably the most widespread of these. Although I've never seen any, I have no reason to doubt the witness of those who got out of it and of those who have studied it. Modern pornography is primarily about degrading women. (I can give references, but privately, my sources explicitly refer to adult content, send me a private message if you want evidence) It is not so much focussed on heightening sexual arousal, but rather on expressing repressed anger against women. I think it is a bitter indictment on feminism as a movement that they actively encouraged pornography and were partly responsible for its legalisation in the first place, even today pornography is defended by most feminists.
Modern pornography is brutal, and surely cannot fail to turn men into brutes. There was much good in feminism, but also some bad. Pornography feeds the resentment of men who have been hurt by women, and there are many, many such men. We cannot really stop men feeling the resentment, nor should we. Most have got good reason to be upset, like I did. This resentment can be dealt with properly by Jesus, who can turn it into a desire to form healthy relationships and train the young to deal faithfully with each other. This is what Jesus did for me. But those who instead get into pornography begin to believe that the way to deal with being hurt by women is to hurt them back. It's the old Satanic line: "Do unto others before they do to you." Such men must surely become brutal towards the women that love them, and sin is added to sin, and the world keeps getting worse and worse. (I'm thinking of 2 Peter 1:4)
To ban pornography will not work. But I would like to see legislation that would cause making pornography to be unviable. For example making it very easy for participants to sue the producers, or making a law like the biblical one that would give a victim of rape unlimited access to the rapist's money and allow a participant in pornography (or prostitution) to sue for rape by a "customer". Either way, pornography would be far too risky to produce. I hope these laws are made and the pornography is destroyed.
But as I see it, there will always be abuse wherever there is sin. My aim is to introduce men and women to Jesus so that he can save them from the evils that the Devil has taught us to destroy ourselves with.
Yet ye say, Wherefore? Because the Lord hath been witness between thee and the wife of thy youth, against whom thou hast dealt treacherously: yet is she thy companion, and the wife of thy covenant. 15 And did not he make one? Yet had he the residue of the spirit. And wherefore one? That he might seek a godly seed. Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously against the wife of his youth. 16 For the Lord, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away: for one covereth violence with his garment, saith the Lord of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously. (Malachi 2:14-16)
God cares about women. While browsing an online forum about psychology I noticed a thread about ways of overcoming addiction to pornography. I have heard about pornography from the pulpit from time to time but I don't remember ever hearing anyone giving ideas about how to get out of it. So I looked at the thread and saw some men had made a few suggestions. But a woman posted a long article (or more like fact-sheet) that was intended to show that pornography is bad.
For the purposes of the thread, I'm not sure how relevant the article was. But it may be useful for people to know how brutal pornography actually is. Let me explain the reasoning, I don't remember where I read/heard it, but the reasoning is very good I think. Lust, sinful desire (not necessarily sexual), is a particularly selfish sin. (Proverbs 6:30-32) In fact we could probably suppose that lust is selfishness in its raw form. In this sense "lust" is entirely different from "sexual arousal/passion/desire" although these words are often used interchangeably. Sexual arousal, passion and desire can be appropriate in the right context (Hebrews 13:4) and a book of the Bible is even dedicated to this, though we often like to spiritualise it away (Song of Solomon).
Sexual arousal is closely linked with love, trust and empathy, lust is not. Lust is closely linked with violence, hatred and… pornography. Lust is a desire to have; to have pleasure, power and fulfilment with no regard to others. This is why the Bible says: I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. (Romans 7:7b) Covet, meaning breaking the 10th Commandment, wanting something that you cannot have without hurting someone, a desire that cannot be righteously satisfied as I once heard it defined.
To experience lust and love at the same time is not possible, because lust wants to take from others and love wants to give to others. It is possible to experience pleasure in the context of love (in any sense), in fact, it is impossible to give love and not experience pleasure. The "selfless" act always brings an emotional reward. It is good to receive love from others, and even seek love from others, especially from God (Acts 17:27; Matthew 6:33) but not to take from them what they do not want to give.
There seem to be three types of exchange. Lustful exchange, taking anything by force or manipulation (including short term giving/loving behaviour), we call this violence. Equal exchange, giving something on the condition of receiving something in return, we call this business, commerce. Loving exchange, giving to another person unconditionally often resulting in a loving exchange in return. We all desire so much to participate in a loving exchange, and a relationship with God is the ultimate fulfilment of that desire.
Since lust and love are so contradictory; hatred and violence cannot exist in the mind while empathy is present. While empathising with a person, one cannot hate or violate. That is the theory. Practically speaking, when people are aware of the horrors that people, especially women, who are involved in producing pornography must endure they must be prompted to feel empathy. This feeling of empathy overwhelms lust, leading the viewer of pornography to be horrified by what he sees not exited.
I have known this idea for some time and had the opportunity to practice it. Growing up in a Christian family sheltered me from many things, but going to school or just passing along a street provide ample sources of corruption. I say corruption because what I was exposed to affected me, though not only in the way people usually talk about.
I experienced an element of lust from what I saw, from what my friends told me and from the way that young women related to me. I frequently saw people who should have been wearing more clothes, both in images and reality. Fortunately I rarely saw complete nakedness, unfortunately, not never. My friends and others who were not my friends told me about things I was not yet curious about at the time, awakening these things before I was naturally ready for them. Their way of talking about sexuality also led to making it a little more separated from marriage and relationship in my mind than it had been. This is typically called the "objectification of women", which starts in the images and gets fostered by young males spending too much unsupervised time among themselves. The behaviour of the young women was usually quite okay. The problem is that it only takes one or two young women to do a lot of damage.
There are a minority of young women in high school who develop early; often mentally but especially physically, and because of the way our system operates, these young women actually have a lot of influence on high school culture and therefore the mental development of many people. In the public (government) school I went to, these young women seemed to get their identity from their sexuality and I think my lack of interest in them was taken as an insult. They attempted to reform me at times, or punish me, I'm not sure which. But I thought it was normal that women would do this, just a fact of life, until I went to a Christian school and I saw a much better world.
Anyway, this is all to say that lust has two sides. The side the Christianity talks about is the sexual desire side, but there is another side, hatred of women. My public school education created a resentment in me towards women. It was women, both teachers and students, that seemed to be attacking me and manipulating me, I feared them and maybe I even hated them.
This is a very new realisation for me, but I share it because I think it is extremely widespread. I believe that although I know I have room for improvement, Jesus has healed my attitude towards women. For the last few years I have had to work with women in ways that has required me to grow a lot spiritually. My work has been in a powerless, assisting role in my local church congregation, the de facto (real) leaders in this congregation are all women, various kinds of women. They have been my supervisors, my co-workers, my teachers, my directors, my rebukers, my counsellors, often simultaneously. They all have been my friends. I believe God put them in my life to bring a restoration to my mind.
I still believe it is wrong for women to exercise authority over men (1 Timothy 2:12), at least in the church. I am not meant to be writing about feminism but about pornography. I got onto this topic because I was trying to understand and recall my ineffective way of overcoming lust.
I knew it was wrong to desire women as an object, and I resisted this temptation better than most I think, but instead Satan took me with the other trap. I thought that to avoid lusting I needed to hate instead and I began to hate the average promiscuous (sexually active) woman. I am sure I did not think this consciously, but it just seemed a natural assumption. For example, I would be forced to hear or sing songs that I associated with either female promiscuity or feminism and my friends and I would deal with them by changing the words to make them about hate or death. I am not the first to have done this kind of thing, and I may have picked it up somewhere. Roman Catholicism and Freemasonry are notable for connecting womanhood with evil and there are no doubt a lot of more present-day examples.
Pornography is probably the most widespread of these. Although I've never seen any, I have no reason to doubt the witness of those who got out of it and of those who have studied it. Modern pornography is primarily about degrading women. (I can give references, but privately, my sources explicitly refer to adult content, send me a private message if you want evidence) It is not so much focussed on heightening sexual arousal, but rather on expressing repressed anger against women. I think it is a bitter indictment on feminism as a movement that they actively encouraged pornography and were partly responsible for its legalisation in the first place, even today pornography is defended by most feminists.
Modern pornography is brutal, and surely cannot fail to turn men into brutes. There was much good in feminism, but also some bad. Pornography feeds the resentment of men who have been hurt by women, and there are many, many such men. We cannot really stop men feeling the resentment, nor should we. Most have got good reason to be upset, like I did. This resentment can be dealt with properly by Jesus, who can turn it into a desire to form healthy relationships and train the young to deal faithfully with each other. This is what Jesus did for me. But those who instead get into pornography begin to believe that the way to deal with being hurt by women is to hurt them back. It's the old Satanic line: "Do unto others before they do to you." Such men must surely become brutal towards the women that love them, and sin is added to sin, and the world keeps getting worse and worse. (I'm thinking of 2 Peter 1:4)
To ban pornography will not work. But I would like to see legislation that would cause making pornography to be unviable. For example making it very easy for participants to sue the producers, or making a law like the biblical one that would give a victim of rape unlimited access to the rapist's money and allow a participant in pornography (or prostitution) to sue for rape by a "customer". Either way, pornography would be far too risky to produce. I hope these laws are made and the pornography is destroyed.
But as I see it, there will always be abuse wherever there is sin. My aim is to introduce men and women to Jesus so that he can save them from the evils that the Devil has taught us to destroy ourselves with.
Saturday, 18 October 2014
Romans 8:12-17 // Adopted by God
Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh. 13 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live. 14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. 15 For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. 16 The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: 17 And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together. (Romans 8:12-17)
Paul has been explaining how it is that we are not condemned if we have the Holy Spirit in our lives. I have been reading and re-reading this passage here, and it hasn't been making a lot of sense to me. I have compared some different translations, and now I see that the first verse should not end with a full stop. The Greek uses a comma, not a period, although the original would have had no punctuation of course. I have used modern punctuation to try to make the meaning clearer, though not with much regard to the technicalities of language: Therefore brethren, we are debtors. (not to the flesh, to live after the flesh, 13 [For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die] but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.) 14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
If I am right about the punctuation, verse 12 is probably connected to verse 14. Until I've heard back from my friendly expert on ancient Roman adoption I will simply conclude that Paul is saying that we are debtors to God because we are adopted sons of God. Those who live "after the Spirit" are sons of God, so they are debtors to God for adopting them. Sometimes you need to read Paul's writings backwards to make sense of them.
So in the parenthetical (bracketed) section, Paul is making the point that we do not have an obligation that is physical, God does not require rituals from us or great selfless acts or keeping his laws meticulously. If this is where we hope to get our salvation from we will not be saved, we will die. But if we stop thinking about how we are measuring up, by thinking about the fact that we are saved by grace, we will be saved, we will live.
We have an obligation, we are debtors, to God; because he has adopted us, not making us slaves, but giving us the privilege of close association with him. The heir not only inherited the kingdom, but took on the co-management of the kingdom with his father. As joint-heirs with Christ we have a place of honour in the universe that we do not deserve at all. But those who will be joint-heirs with Christ will also join in his persecutions. We all have a different cross to bear, I don't know what mine is to be, but I know that Jesus is able to carry me through and I want to endure temptation so that I may receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised me. (See James 1:12)
Paul has been explaining how it is that we are not condemned if we have the Holy Spirit in our lives. I have been reading and re-reading this passage here, and it hasn't been making a lot of sense to me. I have compared some different translations, and now I see that the first verse should not end with a full stop. The Greek uses a comma, not a period, although the original would have had no punctuation of course. I have used modern punctuation to try to make the meaning clearer, though not with much regard to the technicalities of language: Therefore brethren, we are debtors. (not to the flesh, to live after the flesh, 13 [For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die] but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.) 14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
If I am right about the punctuation, verse 12 is probably connected to verse 14. Until I've heard back from my friendly expert on ancient Roman adoption I will simply conclude that Paul is saying that we are debtors to God because we are adopted sons of God. Those who live "after the Spirit" are sons of God, so they are debtors to God for adopting them. Sometimes you need to read Paul's writings backwards to make sense of them.
So in the parenthetical (bracketed) section, Paul is making the point that we do not have an obligation that is physical, God does not require rituals from us or great selfless acts or keeping his laws meticulously. If this is where we hope to get our salvation from we will not be saved, we will die. But if we stop thinking about how we are measuring up, by thinking about the fact that we are saved by grace, we will be saved, we will live.
We have an obligation, we are debtors, to God; because he has adopted us, not making us slaves, but giving us the privilege of close association with him. The heir not only inherited the kingdom, but took on the co-management of the kingdom with his father. As joint-heirs with Christ we have a place of honour in the universe that we do not deserve at all. But those who will be joint-heirs with Christ will also join in his persecutions. We all have a different cross to bear, I don't know what mine is to be, but I know that Jesus is able to carry me through and I want to endure temptation so that I may receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised me. (See James 1:12)
Thursday, 16 October 2014
Romans 8:9-11 // Assurance
But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. 10 And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness. 11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you. (Romans 8:9-11)
Here is the answer to the question of how we may live after the Spirit. If we ask God to give us the Holy Spirit in the name of Jesus he will live in you and me. (Luke 11:13; John 14:14)
So you and I who are converted and have the Holy Spirit are not living after the flesh but after the Spirit. Christ is working on us to change us by his Spirit, we may not be sinless yet, but he is working on it. If we are not living in submission to the Holy Spirit's working in our lives we are not a true Christian, we are not saved.
If on the other hand we are living in submission to God, our life has been laid down. We have died to our reputation among our friends, we have died to our dreams of worldly greatness, we have died to our plans for our happiness. But more literally, like every human on Earth, we are living under a death sentence because we have sinned.
Notice that Paul does not say: "our sinful spirit is dead" or "our innocence is dead". Paul is not teaching original sin here, he says the body is dead because of sin and he doesn't stop there. He goes on to say but the Spirit is life because of righteousness because the Holy Spirit is able to give us life because of the righteousness of Jesus Christ.
If the Holy Spirit was able and willing to raise Jesus from the dead, he will also raise those of us who follow Jesus unto death. Some would say, that even now the Holy Spirit is what gives us life, but I don't see evidence for that here or elsewhere. Someone is welcome to share if they do.
We have God's promises now, he promised to give us the Holy Spirit, and he promises that when we receive the Holy Spirit we are living after the spirit. Do not waste this gift, keep following God's leading and do not let the Devil turn your attention to your weaknesses all the time.
Here is the answer to the question of how we may live after the Spirit. If we ask God to give us the Holy Spirit in the name of Jesus he will live in you and me. (Luke 11:13; John 14:14)
So you and I who are converted and have the Holy Spirit are not living after the flesh but after the Spirit. Christ is working on us to change us by his Spirit, we may not be sinless yet, but he is working on it. If we are not living in submission to the Holy Spirit's working in our lives we are not a true Christian, we are not saved.
If on the other hand we are living in submission to God, our life has been laid down. We have died to our reputation among our friends, we have died to our dreams of worldly greatness, we have died to our plans for our happiness. But more literally, like every human on Earth, we are living under a death sentence because we have sinned.
Notice that Paul does not say: "our sinful spirit is dead" or "our innocence is dead". Paul is not teaching original sin here, he says the body is dead because of sin and he doesn't stop there. He goes on to say but the Spirit is life because of righteousness because the Holy Spirit is able to give us life because of the righteousness of Jesus Christ.
If the Holy Spirit was able and willing to raise Jesus from the dead, he will also raise those of us who follow Jesus unto death. Some would say, that even now the Holy Spirit is what gives us life, but I don't see evidence for that here or elsewhere. Someone is welcome to share if they do.
We have God's promises now, he promised to give us the Holy Spirit, and he promises that when we receive the Holy Spirit we are living after the spirit. Do not waste this gift, keep following God's leading and do not let the Devil turn your attention to your weaknesses all the time.
Monday, 13 October 2014
Romans 8:5-8 // Spiritually Minded
For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. 6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace. 7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. 8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God. (Romans 8:5-8)
This makes perfect sense to me for the first time.
To "mind" is to be mindful, conscious or obedient. When it says "after the" refer back to 8:1 where those who are not condemned ...walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit and go back further to understand what this means. Romans contrasts two groups of people. Those who are "after the flesh" and those who are "after the Spirit". This passages explains this contrast a little.
The "after the flesh" group are mindful, conscious and obedient to tangible (fleshly) things. They are mindful of their reputation among their community. They are conscious of "how well" they are doing compared to other people. They are obedient to the rules and mores of their community. In an upstanding community these people will seem very "Christian" in a "Gangsta" community these people will seem abhorrent.
The "after the Spirit" group are mindful, conscious and obedient to intangible (spirit) things, this passage may be referring specifically to the Holy Spirit. Either way, they are mindful of their reputation with the ruler of the universe and the rest of its inhabitants though they cannot see them or hear them. They are conscious of their complete failure to live up to God's perfect standard but also conscious of the fact that Jesus is their only sure hope for restoration. They are obedient to the laws and counsel (advice) of God although they are not as obedient as they know they should be, but they want to change. In every community these people are recognised as "weird" and "too religious" and frequently as "legalistic" but by those who truly know them they are loved and respected (unlike those who deserve these descriptions) because of their practical demonstration of genuine love. Sometimes they are not yet this distinct, but everyone who is "after the Spirit" will be as peculiar as this soon enough.
To be carnally minded, to think like the world, to intentionally "fit in" to your community, is death. It will surely lead you to lose the chance for eternal life, even if your community is a monastery. You must not be led by your community, you must be led by God.
To be spiritually minded, to take unseen things into account, to intentionally "fit in" to God's kingdom even though it hasn't reached us yet, is life and peace. It may lose you your life now, but it will win you a future life of peace that will never end, and also a present life of peace that nobody can take away.
So the carnal mind is enmity against God, even those who live in a "Christian" bubble and like to fit into their "Christian" community are enemies of God for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. Even if you are in a Seventh-day Adventist bubble where the community does actually respect God's law rather than man's law, the person who keeps God's law out of a desire to conform to their community is not subject to the law of God. No matter how obedient your community is to God's law, you must not focus on your community for your sense of self-worth/salvation/goodness/morality. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
If you want to please God, Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth. (Colossians 3:2) Read the Bible for yourself praying for the Holy Spirit to teach you, and think about what it means. Then when you have an idea of something relevant to you, get out there are do it! Amen.
This makes perfect sense to me for the first time.
To "mind" is to be mindful, conscious or obedient. When it says "after the" refer back to 8:1 where those who are not condemned ...walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit and go back further to understand what this means. Romans contrasts two groups of people. Those who are "after the flesh" and those who are "after the Spirit". This passages explains this contrast a little.
The "after the flesh" group are mindful, conscious and obedient to tangible (fleshly) things. They are mindful of their reputation among their community. They are conscious of "how well" they are doing compared to other people. They are obedient to the rules and mores of their community. In an upstanding community these people will seem very "Christian" in a "Gangsta" community these people will seem abhorrent.
The "after the Spirit" group are mindful, conscious and obedient to intangible (spirit) things, this passage may be referring specifically to the Holy Spirit. Either way, they are mindful of their reputation with the ruler of the universe and the rest of its inhabitants though they cannot see them or hear them. They are conscious of their complete failure to live up to God's perfect standard but also conscious of the fact that Jesus is their only sure hope for restoration. They are obedient to the laws and counsel (advice) of God although they are not as obedient as they know they should be, but they want to change. In every community these people are recognised as "weird" and "too religious" and frequently as "legalistic" but by those who truly know them they are loved and respected (unlike those who deserve these descriptions) because of their practical demonstration of genuine love. Sometimes they are not yet this distinct, but everyone who is "after the Spirit" will be as peculiar as this soon enough.
To be carnally minded, to think like the world, to intentionally "fit in" to your community, is death. It will surely lead you to lose the chance for eternal life, even if your community is a monastery. You must not be led by your community, you must be led by God.
To be spiritually minded, to take unseen things into account, to intentionally "fit in" to God's kingdom even though it hasn't reached us yet, is life and peace. It may lose you your life now, but it will win you a future life of peace that will never end, and also a present life of peace that nobody can take away.
So the carnal mind is enmity against God, even those who live in a "Christian" bubble and like to fit into their "Christian" community are enemies of God for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. Even if you are in a Seventh-day Adventist bubble where the community does actually respect God's law rather than man's law, the person who keeps God's law out of a desire to conform to their community is not subject to the law of God. No matter how obedient your community is to God's law, you must not focus on your community for your sense of self-worth/salvation/goodness/morality. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
If you want to please God, Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth. (Colossians 3:2) Read the Bible for yourself praying for the Holy Spirit to teach you, and think about what it means. Then when you have an idea of something relevant to you, get out there are do it! Amen.
Saturday, 11 October 2014
Reflection on Perfection
I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. (John 15:5)
And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. (1 Thessalonians 5:23)
A further comment on perfection. Perhaps a clarification, perhaps an exploration. Perfection means "wholeness", a seed can be a perfect seed, a shoot can be a perfect shoot, a tree can be a perfect tree but it has never "arrived" and it only stops growing when it is dead. Perfection is to be a present reality, the full surrender of the heart to Jesus, the realisation that without him I am nothing.
To be entirely sanctified, to be blameless, to be without spot or stain, to be like Jesus in character, to hate sin: this is not a present reality for the saved, but rather a goal, a hope, a mission. God wants us to be entirely sanctified, and preserved blameless before the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and he takes responsibility to do that work if we let him. We will not be aware of our purified state until Jesus comes in the clouds and we are called to meet him in the air, then we will know.
Perfection in the sense of present submission for continual growth is and will always be ours to have. Perfection in the sense of unlimited glory is and will never be ours, it is for God alone. The tree can be perfect in its flawlessness, but can always grow, can always be better. God is who he is. God does not change, God alone does not need to grow, he is perfect in his eternal immutability (unchangeableness). We can find perfection in him, only as we allow ourselves to grow continually.
I hope that makes sense.
And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. (1 Thessalonians 5:23)
A further comment on perfection. Perhaps a clarification, perhaps an exploration. Perfection means "wholeness", a seed can be a perfect seed, a shoot can be a perfect shoot, a tree can be a perfect tree but it has never "arrived" and it only stops growing when it is dead. Perfection is to be a present reality, the full surrender of the heart to Jesus, the realisation that without him I am nothing.
To be entirely sanctified, to be blameless, to be without spot or stain, to be like Jesus in character, to hate sin: this is not a present reality for the saved, but rather a goal, a hope, a mission. God wants us to be entirely sanctified, and preserved blameless before the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and he takes responsibility to do that work if we let him. We will not be aware of our purified state until Jesus comes in the clouds and we are called to meet him in the air, then we will know.
Perfection in the sense of present submission for continual growth is and will always be ours to have. Perfection in the sense of unlimited glory is and will never be ours, it is for God alone. The tree can be perfect in its flawlessness, but can always grow, can always be better. God is who he is. God does not change, God alone does not need to grow, he is perfect in his eternal immutability (unchangeableness). We can find perfection in him, only as we allow ourselves to grow continually.
I hope that makes sense.
Thursday, 9 October 2014
Aspiring to Perfection
My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; 3 Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience. 4 But let patience have her perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, wanting nothing. (James 1:2-4)
There is no place I know of in the Bible where it says we should be sure of our perfection. We don't need to feel perfect, and we will always need to trust Jesus for our salvation. But there are many clear Bible commands to be perfect, and we should at least aspire to this ideal.
I am so happy about doing James in Sabbath School, and the fact that whoever wrote the study guide does not twist the scriptures to be politically correct.
There is no place I know of in the Bible where it says we should be sure of our perfection. We don't need to feel perfect, and we will always need to trust Jesus for our salvation. But there are many clear Bible commands to be perfect, and we should at least aspire to this ideal.
I am so happy about doing James in Sabbath School, and the fact that whoever wrote the study guide does not twist the scriptures to be politically correct.
Tuesday, 7 October 2014
Romans 8:2-4 // Life v. Death
For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: 4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. (Romans 8:2-4)
The law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus. What law is this? What rules does it consist of? Who polices this law? These are confusing questions. The truth is that Paul uses the word "law" in more than one way. Here he is using it in the scientific sense. The law of gravity. The laws of thermodynamics. Murphy's law. This kind of law can otherwise be called a force in this context to avoid confusion.
So there is a force from the Holy Spirit who gives life through Jesus and this force frees me from the force (power, law) of sin and death in my life. This means that the previous passages in Romans 7 were not Paul's present state but his past state. Paul described the convicted but unconverted man's struggle with his sinfulness and inability to overcome it. Paul himself, has overcome the force of sin by the force of Christ.
Now Paul uses law in the other sense. God's holy law was unable to stop me from breaking it because it is not a living creature, it is only as strong as the person who tries to keep it, and I was too weak. The law is no more capable of making me obey it than a mirror is capable of rubbing a man's face clean. Funny thought.
But this failure to keep the law is reversed by Jesus who was sent to overcome sin while loaded with our human weakness, and some extra burden as well. The purpose of all this was so that we would be able to follow his example and overcome sin in our human weakness. This is what the Word of God says.
The way we are to do this is not by focussing on keeping the law, that is walking after the flesh, and a sure way to fail. But rather to focus on Jesus and the mission he has given us. "As I survey the wondrous cross, on which the Prince of Glory died. My richest gain I count but loss, and pour contempt on all my pride." Not only the cross, but all aspects of true theology and true love for God and humans (a little different to "humanity") will bring you closer in line with God's law.
Becoming more obedient to God's law is the sign that you are getting closer to God.
The law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus. What law is this? What rules does it consist of? Who polices this law? These are confusing questions. The truth is that Paul uses the word "law" in more than one way. Here he is using it in the scientific sense. The law of gravity. The laws of thermodynamics. Murphy's law. This kind of law can otherwise be called a force in this context to avoid confusion.
So there is a force from the Holy Spirit who gives life through Jesus and this force frees me from the force (power, law) of sin and death in my life. This means that the previous passages in Romans 7 were not Paul's present state but his past state. Paul described the convicted but unconverted man's struggle with his sinfulness and inability to overcome it. Paul himself, has overcome the force of sin by the force of Christ.
Now Paul uses law in the other sense. God's holy law was unable to stop me from breaking it because it is not a living creature, it is only as strong as the person who tries to keep it, and I was too weak. The law is no more capable of making me obey it than a mirror is capable of rubbing a man's face clean. Funny thought.
But this failure to keep the law is reversed by Jesus who was sent to overcome sin while loaded with our human weakness, and some extra burden as well. The purpose of all this was so that we would be able to follow his example and overcome sin in our human weakness. This is what the Word of God says.
The way we are to do this is not by focussing on keeping the law, that is walking after the flesh, and a sure way to fail. But rather to focus on Jesus and the mission he has given us. "As I survey the wondrous cross, on which the Prince of Glory died. My richest gain I count but loss, and pour contempt on all my pride." Not only the cross, but all aspects of true theology and true love for God and humans (a little different to "humanity") will bring you closer in line with God's law.
Becoming more obedient to God's law is the sign that you are getting closer to God.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)